Thesis!

I started my thesis presentation and got a lot of information about trials and how innocent people end up claiming guilty even when they are not. Many innocent people claim they are guilty because of the amount of pressure the police officers put on them or fear. In some cases I read, suspects state that they were tricked into saying what the officers wanted to hear or they "confessed" because the officer refused to feed them or get a phone call. I wonder if there is a better way to getting a confession without forcing them to admit to something they never did without looking at the evidence. hmm

Comments

  1. CorreaSeptember 17, 2017 at 11:47 PM

    probably need more detail (maybe include times)
    missing entries for 9/12 and 9/14

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

1/17

I was looking at how many training the police have to complete. Many have the option to continue strengthening their skills by going to theses training sessions. The ones that have more training have more experience and know how to approach the suspect. They know what works and doesn't. Here's the thing, they can show them fake evidence which is kind of sketchy because it can make people feel pressured into admitting something they didn't do. They can present that but can't make any deals with them. I feel like there should be a better approach when doing that. They have the evidence, why fake it to make it seem they are the ones responsible? Another thing that I was wondering was why would they show them this. Is it because of lack of responsibility or simply because they are too lazy to do the work they chose to do?
Read more

Thesis 9/14

Is there a way to get information out of a person without making them feel like a victim or freaking them out completely when interrogating them? Today I found out that many people lie during an interrogation because either they were tired and wanted to get out, brainwashed into thinking they did it, being at a wrong spot during the wrong time, just saying what the police want to hear, etc. A case that really stood out to me was the Peter Reilly case. This case happened in 1973 and back then, 18 year old Peter was the primary homicide suspect. They accused him of killing his mother when he clearly didn't do it. He had passed a polygraph test but the police told him he didn't. He was interrogated for eight hours when he finally cracked. He told the police he did it but the timing was wrong and fast forward to the future, he's a free man. While reading this case, it was shocking to see that there are frequent wrong-man convictions and one out of four of them are false confess
Read more